Conflict Management
Prevent CP conflicts with clear lead-ownership rules.
The problem teams live with
A partner tagged a buyer in June. In July the same buyer walked into your site office and a direct representative logged them. Both now claim the brokerage. Whatever you decide, someone concludes the process is rigged — and a partner who believes that stops sending you leads.
How Sell.Do solves it
Sell.Do decides ownership by rule, before the argument. An attribution window, a first-verified-tag tie-break and an explicit override authority are configured once and applied to every claim identically. The evidence — who tagged when, through which channel — is on the record, so the outcome is a policy being applied rather than a judgement being made about two people.
Conflict Management, step by step
- 1Ownership rules
- 2Duplicate detection
- 3Tagging windows
- 4Dispute logs
Ownership decided by attribution window and first verified tag — with the evidence on record.
Built for the real workflow
- Ownership rules
- Duplicate detection
- Tagging windows
- Dispute logs
Jarvis finds the pattern behind the conflicts
Three conflicts this month all began with walk-ins that were never checked against partner tags. Jarvis names the cause rather than adjudicating the third dispute.
More in Channel Partners
All Channel PartnersRegistration & Onboarding
Self-serve CP registration with KYC and approval.
Learn moreInventory & Booking Access
Give CPs controlled access to live inventory and bookings.
Learn moreBrokerage Payout
Run transparent, slab-based brokerage payouts.
Learn moreCP Performance
Track and reward your best channel partners.
Learn moreFrequently asked questions
You set it; 90 days is common in Indian real estate. What matters is that it is set in advance and applied uniformly, because a window decided after a dispute is not a rule.
See Conflict Management on your own pipeline
Book a 30-minute walkthrough tailored to your projects, team and process.